Tattoos are relatively taboo in current society, though stigmatization varies depending on the professional environment and national culture. Short reading can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattoo#Modern_associations
Based on my observations, tattoos, especially facial paintings, are used as a literary shortcut to portray exotic peoples. A few examples come to mind. One is the Togruta from Star Wars.
The second are the ancient humans from Halo.
Finally, the Belters from the Expanse.
All three aren't portrayed in a negative light, persay, more to visually represent a deviation from what we consider as the "default" human. But for this setting specifically, how valid is this symbolism? Do surface-borne and the higher class use tattoos less than space-borne and the lower class? I would like to think we become more open to artistic representation of the self as humanity progresses into the 24th century, allowing even high ranking officers to wear facial tattoos without fear of reprisal. Of course, there are practical reasons to avoid tattoos, especially when clarity of your facial expressions is important.
Based on my observations, tattoos, especially facial paintings, are used as a literary shortcut to portray exotic peoples. A few examples come to mind. One is the Togruta from Star Wars.
The second are the ancient humans from Halo.
Finally, the Belters from the Expanse.
All three aren't portrayed in a negative light, persay, more to visually represent a deviation from what we consider as the "default" human. But for this setting specifically, how valid is this symbolism? Do surface-borne and the higher class use tattoos less than space-borne and the lower class? I would like to think we become more open to artistic representation of the self as humanity progresses into the 24th century, allowing even high ranking officers to wear facial tattoos without fear of reprisal. Of course, there are practical reasons to avoid tattoos, especially when clarity of your facial expressions is important.